The symposium on Guns Rights and Regulations Outside the Home looks at the issues left open by the Supreme Court in District of Columbia concerning whether and how the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms extends outside the home. Experts in the legal, historical, and empirical aspects of this question weigh in on the proper approach.

Panel 1: The Second Amendment and Conflicting Interests

Moderator: Joseph Blocher, Faculty Co-Director, Center for Firearms Law & Lanty L. Smith ’67 Professor of Law, Duke University School of Law

The symposium on Guns Rights and Regulations Outside the Home looks at the issues left open by the Supreme Court in District of Columbia concerning whether and how the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms extends outside the home. Experts in the legal, historical, and empirical aspects of this question weigh in on the proper approach.

Panel 2: Regulating People, Places, and Products

Moderator: Kate Shaw, Professor of Law and the Co-Director of the Floersheimer Center for Constitutional Democracy, Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law

The symposium on Guns Rights and Regulations Outside the Home looks at the issues left open by the Supreme Court in District of Columbia concerning whether and how the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms extends outside the home. Experts in the legal, historical, and empirical aspects of this question weigh in on the proper approach.

Panel 4: Historical Conceptions of Second Amendment Rights Outside the Home

Moderator: Darrell A. H. Miller, Faculty Co-Director, Center for Firearms Law & Melvin G. Shimm Professor of Law, Duke University School of Law

The symposium on Guns Rights and Regulations Outside the Home looks at the issues left open by the Supreme Court in District of Columbia concerning whether and how the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms extends outside the home. Experts in the legal, historical, and empirical aspects of this question weigh in on the proper approach.

Panel 3: Empirical and Theoretical Aspects of Firearms in Public

Moderator: Philip J. Cook, ITT/Terry Sanford Professor Emeritus of Public Policy Studies, Duke University Sanford School of Public Policy

Duke Law's Law and Contemporary Problems journal held a symposium on Consumer Credit in America on September 30, 2016.

Panel 1: Consumer Credit and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

• Moderator: Pamela Foohey
• Christopher Peterson, SJ Quinney College of Law, University of Utah
The CFPB’s Power to Regulate “Abusive” Financial Products

• Angela Littwin, University of Texas School of Law
Examination as a Method of Consumer Protection

• Nick Bourke, The Pew Charitable Trusts
The CFPB’s New Payday Loan Regulations

Duke Law's Law and Contemporary Problems journal held a symposium on Consumer Credit in America on September 30, 2016.

Panel 2: The Aftermath of Consumer Indebtedness

• Moderator: Creola Johnson
• Creola Johnson, The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law
Contractual Duplicity: Creditors Force Consumers into Arbitration While Exploiting the Criminal Justice System to Arrest Consumers Who Cannot Pay

• Richard Hynes, University of Virginia School of Law
“Maximum Possible Accuracy” in Credit Reports

Recorded on April 26, 2013.

Lecture titled: Tinkering With the Machinery of the Child Welfare System.

Conference title: Child-Custody Decisionmaking (Law and Contemporary Problems Symposium (2013))

Appearing: Clare Huntington (Fordham Law School), speaker ; Dorianne Lambelet Coleman (Duke Law School), commenter.

Recorded on April 26, 2013.

Lecture titled: Gender Politics & Child Custody: The Puzzling Persistence of the Best Interest Standard.

Conference title: Child-Custody Decisionmaking (Law and Contemporary Problems Symposium (2013))

Appearing: Elizabeth Scott (Columbia Law School), speaker ; Katharine T. Bartlett (Duke Law School), commenter.

Recorded on April 26, 2013.

Lecture titled: Legislating for Shared-Time Parenting After Parental Separation: Insights From Australia?.

Conference title: Child-Custody Decisionmaking (Law and Contemporary Problems Symposium (2013))

Appearing: Bruce Smythe (Australian National University), speaker ; Kimberly D. Krawiec (Duke Law School), commenter.

Recorded on April 26, 2013.

Lecture titled: Who Knows What's Best for Children?.

Conference title: Child-Custody Decisionmaking (Law and Contemporary Problems Symposium (2013))

Appearing: Robert E. Emery (University of Virginia School of Law), speaker ; Suzanne Reynolds (Wake Forest University), commenter.

Recorded on April 26, 2013.

Lecture titled: From Third Parties to Parents: The Case of Same-Sex Couples.

Conference title: Child-Custody Decisionmaking (Law and Contemporary Problems Symposium (2013))

Appearing: Nancy Polikoff (American University College of Law) ; Holning Lau (UNC School of Law), commenter.

Recorded on April 26, 2013.

Lecture titled: Prioritizing Past Caretaking in Child Custody Decisionmaking.

Conference title: Child-Custody Decisionmaking (Law and Contemporary Problems Symposium (2013))

Appearing: Katharine T. Bartlett (Duke Law School), speaker ; Elizabeth Scott (Columbia Law School), commenter.

Recorded on April 26, 2013.

Lecture titled: The Uneasy Alliance Between Parents' Rights & Children's Interests.

Conference title: Child-Custody Decisionmaking (Law and Contemporary Problems Symposium (2013))

Appearing: Emily Buss (University of Chicago Law School), speaker ; Maxine Eichner (UNC School of Law), commenter.

Recorded on April 26, 2013.

Lecture titled: Bargaining in the Shadow of the Best Interest Standard: The Close Connection Between Substance & Process in the Resolution of Divorce-Related Parenting Disputes.

Conference title: Child-Custody Decisionmaking (Law and Contemporary Problems Symposium (2013))

Appearing: Jana Singer (University of Baltimore. School of Law), speaker ; Kathryn Webb Bradley (Duke Law School)

Duke Law's Law and Contemporary Problems journal held a symposium on Consumer Credit in America on September 30, 2016.

Panel 4: Consumer Credit and Law in Society

• Moderator: Pamela Foohey
• Mehrsa Baradaran, University of Georgia School of Law
The Color of Money: Black Banking and Debt Collection

• Sara Greene, Duke University School of Law
Poor Credit: Personal Responsibility in an Era of Credit Reports

What catapults a case into the media spotlight? Who is responsible for focusing media and public attention on a particular case? Once a case gains high-profile status, what are the professional and ethical roles and responsibilities of members of the media, the bar, and the institutions involved? How do media balance their First Amendment right to watch over the operation of government with the rights of the accused?

What catapults a case into the media spotlight? Who is responsible for focusing media and public attention on a particular case? Once a case gains high-profile status, what are the professional and ethical roles and responsibilities of members of the media, the bar, and the institutions involved? How do media balance their First Amendment right to watch over the operation of government with the rights of the accused?

What catapults a case into the media spotlight? Who is responsible for focusing media and public attention on a particular case? Once a case gains high-profile status, what are the professional and ethical roles and responsibilities of members of the media, the bar, and the institutions involved? How do media balance their First Amendment right to watch over the operation of government with the rights of the accused?

What catapults a case into the media spotlight? Who is responsible for focusing media and public attention on a particular case? Once a case gains high-profile status, what are the professional and ethical roles and responsibilities of members of the media, the bar, and the institutions involved? How do media balance their First Amendment right to watch over the operation of government with the rights of the accused?

Duke President Richard Brodhead's comments relating to the Duke Lacrosse case during The Court of Public Opinion conference.

What catapults a case into the media spotlight? Who is responsible for focusing media and public attention on a particular case? Once a case gains high-profile status, what are the professional and ethical roles and responsibilities of members of the media, the bar, and the institutions involved? How do media balance their First Amendment right to watch over the operation of government with the rights of the accused?

What catapults a case into the media spotlight? Who is responsible for focusing media and public attention on a particular case? Once a case gains high-profile status, what are the professional and ethical roles and responsibilities of members of the media, the bar, and the institutions involved? How do media balance their First Amendment right to watch over the operation of government with the rights of the accused?

What catapults a case into the media spotlight? Who is responsible for focusing media and public attention on a particular case? Once a case gains high-profile status, what are the professional and ethical roles and responsibilities of members of the media, the bar, and the institutions involved? How do media balance their First Amendment right to watch over the operation of government with the rights of the accused?

What catapults a case into the media spotlight? Who is responsible for focusing media and public attention on a particular case? Once a case gains high-profile status, what are the professional and ethical roles and responsibilities of members of the media, the bar, and the institutions involved? How do media balance their First Amendment right to watch over the operation of government with the rights of the accused?

What catapults a case into the media spotlight? Who is responsible for focusing media and public attention on a particular case? Once a case gains high-profile status, what are the professional and ethical roles and responsibilities of members of the media, the bar, and the institutions involved? How do media balance their First Amendment right to watch over the operation of government with the rights of the accused?

What catapults a case into the media spotlight? Who is responsible for focusing media and public attention on a particular case? Once a case gains high-profile status, what are the professional and ethical roles and responsibilities of members of the media, the bar, and the institutions involved? How do media balance their First Amendment right to watch over the operation of government with the rights of the accused?